Project FIRESIGN Planned for November Elections: God-Sized Walkers, Wheels of Fire

ANONYMOUS just released a leaked document uncovering the Hillary Clinton for President’s contingency plan to ensure victory in this Novembers Election, discussing the risks and issues of various False Flag Staged Events.

The report, called “Salvage Program”, shows that conventional psychological warfare has not produced substantial results. And recommends Salvage Program FIRESIGN (an augmentation of Project Blue Beam).

The FIRESIGN scenario is that of an invading extraterrestrial force of nearly incomprehensible scale (massive floating cities descending, god sized “walkers” among the clouds with terrifying weapons, wheels of fire and eyes, etc.).

This phenomena, when activated will bring electoral and social systems to a halt and, in afflicted areas, will permit a narrative wherein POTUS is able to “Call a halt” to the invasion and then “hand over the torch” to Clinton, providing a basic continuity of state.

This may seem outlandish but weaponizing the UFO phenomenon against populations (foreign and domestic) was revealed in recently released CIA X-Files, see excerpt below.

The CIA consultants stated that these solutions would probably be found on the margins or just beyond the frontiers of our present knowledge .. with the added possibility that the present dispersal of NUCLEAR WASTE products might also be a factor.

The flying saucer situation contains two elements of DANGER which, in a situation of international tension, have national security implications.

Psychological – With world-wide sightings reported, it was found that, there had been in the Soviet press no report or comment, even satirical, on flying saucers, though Gromko had made one humorous mention of the subject.

With a State-controlled press, this could result ONLY from an official policy decision. The question, therefore, arises as to whether or not these sightings:

1. Could be controlled, 2. Could be Predicted, 3. Could be USED from a psychological warfare point of view, either offensively or defensively.

The public concern with the phenomena indicates that a fair proportion of our population is mentally conditioned to the acceptance of the incredible. In this fact lies the potential for the touching-off of mass hysteria and panic.

Air Vulnerability – The United States Air Warning System depends upon a combination of radar screening and visual observations. The U.S.S.R. is credited with the present capability of delivering an air attack against the U.S.

Yet at any moment of attack, we are now in the position where we cannot, on an instant basis, distinguish hardware from phantom.

Full CIA X-FIles report here – Disclosure is Here – The CIA X-Files‏

Beneson Strategy Group Report below:

D o N o t D i s t r i b u t e | D o N o t C o p y

B E N E N S O N S T R A 1 000 Potomac Street, N T. WE G., SYu iGte R 4 O20 U P Washington, D.C. 20007 TEL 202.339.6060

SALVAGE PROGRAM

Interviews with 2,021 adult Americans conducted by telephone by BSG on October 10 13, 2016.

The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 2 percentage points. The sample uses a LVS based on voting history (65%), self-attestation (12%), social-media data mining (10%), demographic / socio economic class (18%).
This sample includes 1101 interviews among landline respondents and 920 interviews among cell phone respondents.

NO SKEWS OR NARRATIVE SCREENS WERE EMPLOYED

Executive Overview: Hillary Clinton Flash-Crash to 12% Favorable, Losing 19-77% Nationally

At this point Donald Trump has both momentum and enthusiasm. Distrust in the mainstream media is blunting the impact of the collective polling narrative.

As Election Day approaches, Hillary Clinton’s favorable ratings have crashed to historic lows (12%) in nonpartisans and Donald Trump is consolidating support (97% of LV Republican-identifying respondents are either enthusiastic or very enthusiastic about voting for Trump).

Among independents, Hillary voters who are exposed to any alternative media (73%) are aware of the WikiLeaks emails and find them either disturbing (54%) or deeply disturbing (18%). Among liberal-identifying whites, support is shifting from Hillary (-27 since October 1st) to Donald Trump (78%) or Jill Stein (21%).

For voters who solely consume mainstream media only 28% are aware of the WikiLeaks emails and of those, only 8% are aware of the content. For these voters Clinton leads Trump by +8.

Minority voters are less likely to consume alternative media (only 14%) and are less likely to be aware of the email leak (only 18% for males, 9% for females). Even with this group, enthusiasm is down 63 points compared to October 2008.

On other fronts, the counter-narrative is failing as well. Most heavy consumers of social media understand that the allegations against Donald Trump of sexual misconduct have largely been debunked (77%). We understand that communications strategies in that space have been unable to reduce the impact of this messaging. Worse, among white males in telephone polling 93% of them either approve (72%) or strongly approve (21%) of Donald Trump’s hot-mic tape.

Only 39% of women approve of them however a majority (64%) say they ‘understand that confident men talk that way.’ In effect, these allegations have been diffused.

On a positive note, most respondents who were liberal leaning (83%) or Independent (59%) were unaware of the messaging front concerning Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct. While the vast majority (88%) were aware of consensual extra-marital relationships, the mainstream media approach to the stories has left only 8% of liberal-leaning voters and only 19% of independents aware of the allegations of rape.

On a disturbing note, some 70% of Republican-leaning voters are aware bussed-in voting, false-face operations, and dead-man’s-party registration drives. This may necessitate severe strategy changes for November.

Top-Line Numbers

At this point Donald Trump has both momentum and enthusiasm. Distrust in the mainstream media is blunting the impact: (See attachment for charts)

CLINTON’S COLLAPSE IN BOTH SOFT AND HARD SUPPORT WAS STEADY AND PRONOUNCED FOLLOWING THE FIRST DEBATE

Benenson Group Internal Polling

Findings

I. The Damage Has Metastasized

Hillary is widely considered sick, untrustworthy, and most Hillary-leaning Democrats would vote to replace her.

Q13: [ Democrat Leaning ] If possible you would swap Hillary Clinton for:

I would keep Hillary ………. 8%
Jill Stein ……………………….. 31%
Bernie Sanders ……………………….. 17%
Joe Biden ……………………….. 28%
Julian Assange ……………………….. 4%
Edward Snowden ……………………….. 2%
John Edwards ……………………….. 3%
Not sure ……………………….. 7%

Q14: Hillary suffers from what ailment?

Nothing / Healthy ……………………….. 21%
Pneumonia ……………………….. 18%
Brain cancer ……………………….. 16%
Parkinson’s disease ……………………….. 10%
Vascular dementia ……………………….. 16%
Alzheimer’s disease ……………………….. 2%
Anti-social personality disorder…….. 13%
Not sure ……………………….. 4%

Q15: According to the WikiLeaks emails, Hillary
hates ‘everyday people’

Yes ……………………….. 52%
No ……………………….. 15%
Not sure ……………………….. 33%

Q16 [ Trump has the temperament to be president ] Donald Trump has the temperament to be president because?

He fights the mainstream media’s lies.. 33%
He is a strong, alpha-male personality.. 21%
His temperament is winning.. 27%
A president willing to get angry is what we need right now.. 12%
His temperament will frighten America’s enemies….. 5%
Not sure / other ………….. 2%

II. Trump Voters are Virtually Unstoppable

Where 11% of Hard Clinton supporters could be dissuaded from voting by a strong storm and 17% would balk at a 90 minute wait, Trump’s strong support only diminishes in the events of catastrophic attacks on America. Some demographics (blue-collar white men
between the ages of 30 and 64) were more likely to say they would vote in the event of an active riot standing between them and the ballot.

No Clinton supporters made it past the Q20 screening question while 74% of Trump voters moved to question 21.

Q19 [ Hard Clinton support ] What events could stop you from voting (LV Voter Screen)
A storm ……………………….. 2%
A powerful storm ……………………….. 9%
Zika or other epidemiological agent……….. 12%
Threat of violence at polling places….. 11%
Long Lines (90min+) …………….. 17%
None ……………………….. 45%
Not sure / other ……………………….. 4%

Q19 [ Hard Trump support ] What events could stop you from voting (LV Voter Screen)

A storm ……………………….. 0%
A powerful storm………….. 3%
Zika or other epidemiological agent……….. 1%
Threat of violence at polling places….. 4%
Long Lines (90min+) …….. 0%
None …………….. 90%
Not sure / other ….. 2%

Q20 [ Hard Clinton support ] What events could stop you from voting (LV Voter Screen, None on Q19)

Threat of war ……………………….. 14%
Natural disaster ……………………….. 23%
Active Riots / Civil Unrest….. 40%
Lethal epidemiological agent (smallpox)…….. 22%
None …………….. 0%
Not sure / other ………….. 1%

Q20 [ Hard Trump support ] What events could stop you from voting (LV Voter Screen, None on Q19)

Threat of war ……………………….. 3%
Natural disaster ……………………….. 5%
Active Riots / Civil Unrest.. 0%
Lethal epidemiological agent (smallpox)…….. 16%
None ……………………….. 74%
Not sure / other ……………………….. 2%

Q21 [ Hard Trump support ] What events could stop you from voting (LV Voter Screen, None on Q20)

Shooting war in neighborhood…….. 8%
External invading force ………….. 17%
Attack by extraterrestrials……….. 38%
Biblical event ……………………….. 16%
None ……………………….. 17%
Not sure / other ……………………….. 4%

III. The Public Has Lost Faith In Polling

Poll-driven narratives have been pushed too far, alienating most of the voting population. The use of polls as a psychological weapon has also been noticed (especially on social media). As the poll-gap narrative becomes ever more extreme, obvious visible evidence (rally-size,yard-signs, bumper-stickers, memes / social-media posts) becomes more and more obviously contradictory. Attempts at shaming outspoken poll-deniers such as Bill Mitchell on Twitter have failed in 2016 where they succeeded (Dean Chambers) in 2012. We are in uncharted territory.

Even hooks into non-philosophically compromised pro-Republican polling outfits such as FOX, Rasmussen, and Gravis have not produced substantial results .

Q34 I trust polling to

Provide an accurate overview of the race…….. 11%
Provide a general point-in-time assessment…….. 13%
Provide pro-Democrat propaganda…….. 56%
Be damaged, misleading, or absurd….. 14%
Not sure / other ……………………….. 6%

Q35 For an accurate view of the race, I trust

FOX News ……………………….. 6%
Broadcast News (ABC/NBC/CBS)…….. 5%
Cable News (CNN, MSNBC, FOX)……….. 2%
TV or newspaper analysis ……….. 2%
Social Media ……………….. 31%
My gut instincts …………….. 21%
Donald Trump …………….. 29%
Hillary Clinton ……………….. 1%
Not sure / other …………….. 3%

Salvage Options (Recommendation & Alternatives)

We have analyzed a number of potential salvage options and have a strong recommendation.

Non-Recommended Salvage Options

Optional Scenario Notes Risks / Issues

Red Dawn Support is too wide-spread. While an RD scenario using UN
forces and Canadian-border infil would be effective in shutting down northern voting, it would simply delay the inevitable and result in hardened support for Mr. Trump.

Risks / Issues Loss of property (& life) Alt-Right forces are prepared for battle

Cobalt Rain The public has been primed for radiological attack and stockpiles have been positioned but while the psychological impact of a Co-60 weapon is severe, the threshold of opportunity may have passed for this to stop a vote.

Risks / Issues Loss of profit under martial law. Leaks could compromise

BLRiot Again, while staged civil unrest could prevent pockets of America from voting, the damage is too wide-spread.

Risks / Issues Command and control is dicey at this point as substantial numbers of employed minorities have defected to Trump

Zikpocalypse Improved strains of ZIKV have been delivered and we have disseminated them to operatives. Unfortunately this will suppress women voters more than men (even as ZIKV2 is lethal in adults). This would hurt Hillary Clinton and Trump voters are willing to risk lethal pathogens to vote

Risks / Issues Post-election control

Sharia Escalation States have blocked key immigrant operatives. Without the
required Muslim-Islamist population in place, the IE plan will not be sufficiently impactful.

Risks / Issues LEO is pro-Trump and will not roll over due to Muslim demands of political Correctness

Unnatural Disaster HAARP is in skeleton crew mode. Subterranean thermobaric devices in fracking mines are untested. Surveys suggest this might not stop Trump voters

Risks / Issues Unproven techniques / unintended consequences. Reactivating HAARP may have PALE HORSE PROTOCOL ramifications

Recommended Salvage:

FIRESIGN

For almost two decades the Department of Defense and NASA have coordinated on a black book project under the codename FIRESIGN. FIRESIGN’s aim is to create a religious “awe effect” in enemy populations to create an instantaneous psychological soft kill (abject submission).

The operation uses high powered lasers to project real seeming images on the sodium layer 100km above the surface. These images can cover hundreds or even thousands of square miles and can appear completely real, three dimensional, and can move.

These visual cues are augmented with pulsed ELF electromagnetic emissions (see: PROJECT SANGUINE) that attack the specific areas of the prefrontal cortex that are stimulated during religious experience.

In limited tests, subjects have been able to be overwhelmed on both axis of vastness (an overwhelming of the subject’s frame of reference) and a powerful need-for accommodation.

The mix of these two will produce inaction, lack of focus on self or individual interaction, and gross transformations in mental equilibrium (a Road-to-Damascus Experience).

The ability to produce these effects across 23% of the continental United States is the objective of FIRESIGN and field tests in the Levant have proven successful.

The FIRESIGN scenario is that of an invading extraterrestrial force of nearly incomprehensible scale (massive floating cities descending, god sized “walkers” among the clouds with terrifying weapons, wheels of fire and eyes, etc.).

This phenomena, when activated will bring electoral and social systems to a halt and, in afflicted areas, will permit a narrative wherein POTUS is able to “Call a halt” to the invasion and then “hand over the torch” to Clinton, providing a basic continuity of state.

AFTERMATH

The aftermath of FIRESIGN will be the psychological subjugation of areas where uprisings are most likely to occur. The induced trauma of FIRESIGN will provide ample cover to government and NGOs who will be “providing aid” (psychotropic to induce docility) and counseling services which will ensure further domestication. FIRESIGN will require a great deal of power, mobile command stations with nitrogen cooled super computers, and the coopting of the ELF arrays.

We have created a schedule and teams roster that can be moved into position following the third debate.

{End of File.}

Who is the BSG?

The Beneson Strategy Group Clients include …

For those that are sceptical that our Government would consider such a diabolical scheme against it’s own population, I offer the following food for thought.

In the late 70’s, germ warfare experiments against the United States population were brought out into open by the press. The United States Army disclosed that they had conducted 239 open-air tests between 1949 and 1969 over U.S. major cities, of those, 80 were admitted to contain actual live germ agents.

These attacks were carried out over New York, San Francisco, Panama City, Key West among others. If we accept the Army’s figures, that 80 live agent disease attacks were carried out over a twenty year period, we discover an average of 4 germ attacks against major US cities every year for 20 years.

One experiment designed to determine both the attack and defensive capabilities of biological weapons was in 1950. A Navy ship blanketed San Fransisco and it’s neighboring communities with a bacteria-laden fog for 6 days, according to U.S. Military documentation. It concluded that all 800,000 residents were exposed to the agent “Serratia”, a type of pneumonia that can be fatal.

Though these germ “experiments” reportedly ended in 1969, we would be foolish not to question the validity of that claim considering past history.

–Patrick C.