We're talking about malware on steroids that is AI-enabled. That's just one description – and a mild one at that – of the doomsday scenarios played out, analyzed and discussed in a game format at the "Great Debate: The Future of Artificial Intelligence – Who's in Control?" held last weekend at Arizona State University. About 40 scientists, cyber-security experts and policy experts were hosted by Eric Horvitz, managing director of Microsoft's Redmond Lab, Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn, and ASU physicist Lawrence Krauss at the day-long doom-apalooza that was funded in part by Tallinn and Elon Musk. What does Elon have to worry about? The worst-case scenarios came from the participants and were required to use current AI technologies in realistic situations that could occur in the next five to 25 years. They were next divided into two teams – one made of attackers who initiated the problems and one made of defenders who had to find ways to stop them. The oxymoronic best worst-case